Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
China CDC Wkly ; 4(30): 655-659, 2022 Jul 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1965175

ABSTRACT

What is already known about this topic?: Many regions in China have recently reported outbreaks of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the Omicron variant. What is added by this report?: Wuchuan County, Guizhou Province reacted quickly and implemented accurate intervention measures to effectively control the outbreak. The susceptible-exposed-infectious-asymptomatic-removed (SEIAR) model was applied to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention measures. What are the implications for public health practice?: Fast response measures should be taken to prevent the spread of outbreaks caused by the Omicron variant.

2.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 16(1): 32-40, 2022 01 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1706259

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused an outbreak around the world. Early detection of severe illness is crucial for patients' survival. We analysed initial clinical characteristics of 146 patients with COVID-19 reported in Guizhou province, China to explore risk factors for transforming mild illness to severe. METHODOLOGY: Data of 146 laboratory-confirmed cases were collected and evaluated by the survival analysis of univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: On initial presentation, patients had fever (51.05%), dry cough (45.45%), headache (16.08%), shortness of breath (7.75%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (13.99%). Among 146 laboratory-confirmed cases, 30 patients (20.55%) had severe illness and needed Intensive Care Unit care for supportive treatment. The remaining patients (116, 79.45%) were non-severe cases. Nineteen (19/146, 13.01%) of 30 patients in the Intensive Care Unit had comorbidities, including hypertension (12, 40.00%), diabetes (5, 16.67%), cardiovascular disease (5, 16.67%) and pulmonary disease (4, 13.33%). For survival analysis, patients who had fever (HR = 3.30, 95% CI = 1.31, 8.29) and comorbidities (HR = 9.76, 95% CI = 4.28, 22.23) at baseline were more likely to be admitted into the Intensive Care Unit. Few variables were not related to the survival time of discharge from baseline to discharge and from Intensive Care Unit care to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Severe patients with COVID-19 should be paid more attention. On initial symptoms, many patients did not have fever, but those with fever were more likely to be admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Comorbidities were likewise a risk factor of severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Disease Surveillance ; 36(6):581-586, 2021.
Article in Chinese | CAB Abstracts | ID: covidwho-1374560

ABSTRACT

Objective: To analyze the epidemiological characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in Guizhou, and provide evidence for the prevention and control of COVID-19.

4.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 15(3): 389-397, 2021 03 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1175608

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: At the end of 2019, the COVID-19 broke out, and spread to Guizhou province in January of 2020. METHODOLOGY: To acquire the epidemiologic characteristics of COVID-19 in Guizhou province, we collected data from 169 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 related cases. We described the demographic characteristics of the cases and estimated the incubation period, serial interval and the effective reproduction number. We also presented two representative case studies in Guizhou province: Case Study 1 was an example of the asymptomatic carrier; while Case Study 2 was an example of a large and complex infection chain that involved four different regions, spanning three provinces and eight families. RESULTS: Two peaks in the incidence distribution associated with COVID-19 in Guizhou province were related to the 6.04 days (95% CI: 5.00 - 7.10) of incubation period and 6.14±2.21 days of serial interval. We also discussed the effectiveness of the control measures based on the instantaneous effective reproduction number that was a constantly declining curve. CONCLUSIONS: As of February 2, 2020, the estimated effective reproduction number was below 1, and no new cases were reported since February 26. These showed that Guizhou Province had achieved significant progress in preventing the spread of the epidemic. The medical isolation of close contacts was consequential. Meanwhile, the asymptomatic carriers and the super-spreaders must be isolated in time, who would cause a widespread infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Carrier State/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Carrier State/virology , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Female , Geography , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infectious Disease Incubation Period , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
5.
N Engl J Med ; 382(13): 1199-1207, 2020 03 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-57

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The initial cases of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)-infected pneumonia (NCIP) occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019 and January 2020. We analyzed data on the first 425 confirmed cases in Wuhan to determine the epidemiologic characteristics of NCIP. METHODS: We collected information on demographic characteristics, exposure history, and illness timelines of laboratory-confirmed cases of NCIP that had been reported by January 22, 2020. We described characteristics of the cases and estimated the key epidemiologic time-delay distributions. In the early period of exponential growth, we estimated the epidemic doubling time and the basic reproductive number. RESULTS: Among the first 425 patients with confirmed NCIP, the median age was 59 years and 56% were male. The majority of cases (55%) with onset before January 1, 2020, were linked to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, as compared with 8.6% of the subsequent cases. The mean incubation period was 5.2 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 7.0), with the 95th percentile of the distribution at 12.5 days. In its early stages, the epidemic doubled in size every 7.4 days. With a mean serial interval of 7.5 days (95% CI, 5.3 to 19), the basic reproductive number was estimated to be 2.2 (95% CI, 1.4 to 3.9). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this information, there is evidence that human-to-human transmission has occurred among close contacts since the middle of December 2019. Considerable efforts to reduce transmission will be required to control outbreaks if similar dynamics apply elsewhere. Measures to prevent or reduce transmission should be implemented in populations at risk. (Funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China and others.).


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Disease Transmission, Infectious/statistics & numerical data , Epidemics , Infectious Disease Incubation Period , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Betacoronavirus/genetics , COVID-19 , China/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Epidemics/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL